| nettime's_embedded_controller on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:09:49 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| <nettime> self-associated digest [x2: hardie, hopkins] |
Re: <nettime> "in association with nettime.org"
"martin hardie" <martin.hardie@gmail.com>
John Hopkins <jhopkins@commspeed.net>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:55:31 +0100
From: "martin hardie" <martin.hardie@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: <nettime> "in association with nettime.org"
netime by poll???
a nettime poll tax?
On 11/29/06, Florian Cramer <fc-nettime@plaintext.cc> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2006 um 06:09:10 Uhr (+0100) schrieb Geert
> Lovink:
>
> > > A one-day conference in association with nettime.org <www.nettime.org>
> > > which explores the geographical and social structures of workers in
> > > the Creative Industries and particularly the New Media sector
>
> How can a conference be made "in association with nettime.org" without
> any poll on the list? All the more when it perpetuates that terribly
> stupid meme of the "Creative Industries"? Or is this event a fraud and
> refers to nettime without any authorization?
>
> It it time for some tactical media use of ubermorgen.com's "Injunction
> Generator" against the organizers of that event?
<...>
--
#+34 666519359 #
#http://openflows.org/~auskadi/ #
#http://auskadi.civiblog.org #
#http://auskadi.tk #
#IRC: aussieman on #gentlegeeks at freenode.net #
The lover wants the loved one with all its predicates, its being such as it
is. The lover desires the as only insofar as it is such -this is the lover's
particular fetishism.
Giorgio Agamben The Coming Community
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:18:12 -0700
From: John Hopkins <jhopkins@commspeed.net>
Subject: Re: <nettime> "in association with nettime.org"
> CYBERSALON @ THE DANA CENTRE
> DIGITAL WORK & CREATIVE MAPPING
> The Science Museum's Dana Centre, 165 Queen's Gate, South Kensington,
> London SW7 5HE <www.danacentre.org.uk>
> Date: March 07 - to be announced
> Cost: Cost and booking details to be announced
> Nearest tubes: South Kensington/Gloucester Road
On the front page of the Dana Center "The Dana Center is sexing up
science for the masses"
sheesh!
And I find no mention of this project in the calendar for March 2007.
> > > A one-day conference in association with nettime.org <www.nettime.org>
>> > which explores the geographical and social structures of workers in
>> > the Creative Industries and particularly the New Media sector
at one level -- as an individual who doesn't often identify myself as
a 'nettimer', more simply a participant in the nettime network -- who
cares?
although it would be interesting to know WHO exactly from nettime is
facilitating this 'association.'
on the other hand it could be interpreted as a cheap tactic of career
promotion of an individual climber.
what about insisting that there be a public synchronous forum
available to nettime 'associatess' to actually input into the
conference space...
>How can a conference be made "in association with nettime.org" without
>any poll on the list? All the more when it perpetuates that terribly
>stupid meme of the "Creative Industries"? Or is this event a fraud and
>refers to nettime without any authorization?
good questions. I believe we are entitled to answers!
Cheers
John
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net